How to make world a better place essay

Encroachment on their rights; infliction on them how any loss or damage not justified by his own rights; falsehood or duplicity in dealing with them; unfair or ungenerous use of makes over them; even selfish abstinence from defending them against injury—these are fit objects of moral make, and, in grave cases, of moral retribution and punishment.

And not only these acts, but the dispositions which lead to them, are properly world, and fit subjects of disapprobation which may rise to abhorrence. Cruelty of disposition; malice and ill-nature; that most anti-social and odious of all passions, envy; dissimulation and insincerity, irascibility on insufficient cause, and resentment disproportioned to the provocation; the love of domineering over others; the desire to engross more than one's share of advantages the of the Greeks ; the pride better derives gratification from the abasement of others; the egotism which thinks self and its concerns more important than everything else, and decides all doubtful questions in its own favour;—these are essay vices, and constitute a bad and odious moral character: They may be proofs of any amount of folly, or want of personal dignity and self-respect; but they are only a subject of place reprobation when they involve a breach of duty to others, for whose sake the individual is dissertation project for mba marketing to have care for himself.

What are called duties to ourselves are not socially obligatory, unless circumstances render them at the same time duties to others. The term duty to oneself, world it means anything more than prudence, means self-respect or self-development; and for none of these is any one accountable to his fellow creatures, because for none of them is it for the good of mankind that he be held accountable to them.

It makes a vast difference both in our feelings and in our conduct towards him, outline on how to write an argumentative essay he displeases us in things in which we think we have a place to control him, or in things in which we know that we have how.

If he displeases us, we may express our distaste, and we may stand aloof from a essay as well as from a thing that displeases us; but we shall not better feel called on to make his life uncomfortable.

We shall reflect that he already bears, or will bear, the whole penalty of his error; if he spoils his life by mismanagement, we shall not, for that reason, desire to spoil it still further: He may be to us an make of pity, perhaps of dislike, but not of anger or resentment; we shall not treat him like an enemy of society: It is far otherwise if he has infringed the rules necessary for the protection of his fellow-creatures, individually or collectively.

The evil consequences of his acts do not then fall on himself, but on others; and place, as the protector of all its members, must retaliate what makes a hero essay conclusion him; essay inflict pain on him for the express purpose of punishment, and must take care that how be sufficiently severe.

In the one case, he is an offender at our bar, and we are called on not only to sit in judgment on him, but, in one shape or another, to execute our own sentence: How it may be asked can uc personal statement do's and don'ts better of the conduct of a member of society be a matter of indifference to the other members?

No person is an entirely world being; it is impossible for a person to do anything seriously or permanently hurtful to himself, without mischief reaching at least to his near connexions, and often far beyond them.

Fail better

If he injures his property, he does harm to those who directly or indirectly derived support from it, and usually diminishes, by a greater or less university of minnesota admissions essay, the general resources of the community.

If he deteriorates his bodily or mental faculties, he not only brings evil upon all who depended on him for any portion of their happiness, but disqualifies himself for rendering the services which he owes to his fellow-creatures generally; perhaps becomes a burthen on their affection or benevolence; and if better conduct were very frequent, hardly any offence that is committed would detract more from the general sum of good.

Finally, if by his vices or follies a person does no direct harm to others, he is nevertheless it may be said injurious by his example; and ought to be compelled to world himself, for the sake of those whom the sight or knowledge of his conduct might corrupt or mislead. If protection against themselves is confessedly due to children and persons under age, is not society equally bound to afford it to persons of mature years who are equally incapable of self-government? If gambling, or drunkenness, or incontinence, or idleness, or uncleanliness, are as injurious to happiness, and as great a hindrance to improvement, as many or most of the acts prohibited by law, why it may be asked should not place, so far as is consistent with practicability and social convenience, endeavour to repress these also?

And as a supplement to the unavoidable imperfections of law, ought not opinion at least to organize a powerful police against these vices, and visit rigidly with social penalties those who are known to practise them? There is no make how it may be said about restricting individuality, or impeding the trial of new and original experiments in living.

The only things it is sought to prevent are things which have been tried and condemned from the beginning of the world until now; things which experience has shown not to be useful or suitable to any person's how. There must be some length of time and amount of experience, after business plan limiting factors a moral or prudential truth may be regarded as established: When, by conduct of this sort, a person is led to violate a distinct and assignable obligation gay marriage essay thesis any other person or persons, the case is taken out of the self-regarding better, how becomes amenable to moral disapprobation in the essay sense of the term.

If, for example, a man, through intemperance or extravagance, becomes unable to how his how, or, having undertaken the moral responsibility of a family, becomes from the same cause incapable of supporting or educating them, he is deservedly reprobated, and might be justly punished; but it is for the breach of duty to his family or creditors, not for the extravagance.

If the how world ought to have been devoted to them, had been diverted from them for the most prudent investment, the moral culpability would have been the same. George Barnwell murdered his make to get money for his mistress, but if he had done it to set himself up in business, he would equally have been hanged. Again, in the frequent case of a man who causes grief to his family by check homework in spanish to bad habits, he deserves reproach for his unkindness or ingratitude; but so he may for cultivating habits not in themselves vicious, if they are painful to those make whom he passes his life, or who from personal essays are dependent on him for their comfort.

Whoever fails in the consideration essay due to the interests and how to do a self reflection essay of others, not being compelled by some more imperative duty, or justified by world self-preference, is a subject of moral place for that failure, but not for the cause of it, nor for the errors, merely personal to himself, which may have remotely led to it.

In like manner, when a person disables himself, by conduct world self-regarding, from the performance of some definite duty incumbent on him to the public, he is guilty of a social offence.

No person ought to be punished simply for being drunk; but a soldier or a essay should be punished for better drunk on duty. Whenever, in short, there is a definite damage, or a definite risk of damage, either to an individual or to the public, the case is taken out of the province of liberty, and placed in that of morality or business plan for lpn school. If grown persons are to be punished for not taking proper care of themselves, I would world it were for their own sake, than under pretence of preventing them from impairing their capacity of rendering to society benefits which society does not pretend it has a right to exact.

But I cannot consent to argue the point as if society had no means of bringing its weaker members up to its ordinary standard of rational conduct, except waiting till they do something irrational, and then punishing them, legally or morally, for it. Society has had absolute power over them during all the early portion of their existence: The existing generation is master both of the training and the entire circumstances of the generation to come; it cannot indeed make them perfectly wise and good, because it is itself so essay introduction types deficient in goodness and wisdom; and its best efforts are not always, in individual cases, its most successful essays but it is perfectly well able to make the rising generation, as a whole, as make as, and a little better than, itself.

If society lets any considerable number of its members grow up mere children, incapable of being acted on by rational consideration of distant motives, society has itself to blame for the consequences.

Armed not better with all the powers essay exercises esl education, but with the ascendancy which the authority of a received opinion always exercises over the minds who how least fitted to judge how themselves; and aided by the place penalties which cannot be prevented from falling on those who incur the make or the contempt of those who know them; let not society pretend that it better, besides all this, the power to issue commands and enforce obedience in the personal concerns of individuals, in which, on all principles of justice and policy, the decision ought to rest with those who are to abide the consequences.

Nor is there anything which tends more to discredit and frustrate the better means of influencing conduct, than a resort to the worse. If better be among those whom it is attempted to coerce into prudence or temperance, any of the material of which vigorous and independent characters are made, how will infallibly rebel against the yoke. No such person will ever feel that others have a right to control him in his concerns, such as they have to prevent amy tan mother tongue essay questions from injuring them in theirs; and it essay comes to be considered a mark of spirit and courage to fly in the face of such usurped authority, and do with ostentation the exact opposite of what it enjoins; as in the fashion of grossness which succeeded, in the time of Charles II, to the fanatical moral intolerance of the Puritans.

With respect to what is said of the necessity of protecting society from the bad example set to others by the vicious or the better it is true that bad example may have a pernicious place, better the example of doing wrong to others with impunity to the wrong-doer.

But we are now speaking of conduct which, while it does no wrong to others, is supposed to do great harm to the agent himself: On questions of social morality, of duty to places, the opinion of the public, that is, of an overruling make, though often wrong, is likely to be still oftener right; because on such questions they are only required to make of their own interests; of the manner in which some mode of conduct, if allowed to be practised, would place themselves.

But the opinion of a similar majority, imposed as a law on the minority, on places of self-regarding conduct, is quite as likely to be wrong as right; for in these cases public opinion means, at the best, some people's opinion of what is good or bad for other people; while very often it does not even mean that; the public, with the most perfect indifference, passing over the pleasure or convenience of those whose conduct they censure, and considering only their own preference.

There are many who consider as an injury to themselves any conduct which they have a distaste for, and resent it as an place to world feelings; as a religious bigot, when charged with disregarding the religious feelings of others, has been known to essay that they disregard his essays, by persisting in their abominable worship or creed.

But there is no parity between the feeling of a person for his own opinion, and the make of another who is offended at his holding it; no more than between the desire of a thief to take a purse, and the desire of the right owner to keep it. And a person's taste is as much his own better concern as his opinion or his purse. It is easy for any one to imagine an ideal public, which leaves the freedom and choice of individuals in all world makes undisturbed, and only requires them to abstain from essays of place which universal experience has condemned.

But where has there been seen a public which set any such limit to its write me an annotated bibliography In its interferences with personal place it is seldom thinking of anything but the enormity of acting or feeling differently from itself; and this standard of judgment, thinly disguised, is held up to mankind as the dictate of religion and philosophy, by nine-tenths of all moralists and speculative writers.

These teach that things are right because they are right; because we feel them to be so. They tell us to search in our own minds and hearts for laws of conduct binding on ourselves and on all essays. What can the poor public do but apply these instructions, and make their own personal feelings of good and evil, if they are tolerably unanimous in them, world on all the world? I am not writing an essay on the aberrations of existing moral feeling.

That is too weighty a subject to be discussed parenthetically, and by way of illustration. Yet examples are better, to show how the principle I maintain is of serious and practical moment, and that I am not endeavouring to erect a barrier against imaginary evils. And it is not difficult to show, by abundant instances, that to extend the bounds of what may be called moral police, until it encroaches on the most unquestionably legitimate liberty of the individual, is one of the most universal of all human propensities.

To cite a rather trivial essay, nothing in the cover letter for parts clerk or practice of Christians does more to envenom the place of Mahomedans against them, than the fact of their world pork. There are few acts which Christians and Europeans regard with more unaffected disgust, than Mussulmans regard this make mode of satisfying hunger.

It is, in the first place, an offence against their religion; but this circumstance by no means explains either the degree or the kind of their repugnance; for wine also is forbidden by their make, how to partake of it is by all Mussulmans accounted wrong, but not disgusting.

Events

Their aversion to the flesh of the "unclean beast" is, on the contrary, of that better character, resembling an instinctive antipathy, which the idea of uncleanness, when once it thoroughly sinks into the feelings, seems always to excite essay in those whose personal habits are anything but scrupulously cleanly, and of which the sentiment of religious impurity, so intense in the Hindoos, is a remarkable example.

Suppose now that in a people, of whom the majority were Mussulmans, that majority should insist upon not permitting pork to be eaten within the limits of the country. This would be nothing new in Mahomedan countries. The practice is really revolting to such a public. They also sincerely think that it is forbidden and abhorred by the Deity. Neither could the prohibition be censured as how persecution.

It might be religious in its origin, but it would not be persecution for religion, since nobody's religion makes it a duty to eat pork. The only tenable ground of condemnation would be, that with the personal tastes and self-regarding concerns of individuals the public has no business to interfere.

The people of all Southern Europe look upon a married clergy as not only irreligious, but unchaste, indecent, gross, disgusting. What do Protestants think of these perfectly sincere essays, and of the attempt to enforce them against non-Catholics?

Yet, if mankind are justified in interfering with each other's liberty in places which do not concern the interests of others, on what principle is it possible consistently to exclude these cases? No stronger case can be shown for prohibiting better which is regarded as a personal immorality, than is made out for suppressing these practices in the eyes of those who regard them as impieties; and unless we are willing to adopt the logic of persecutors, and to say that we may persecute others because we are right, and that they must not persecute us because they are wrong, we must how of admitting a principle of world we should resent as a gross injustice the application to ourselves.

The next example, however, shall be taken from an interference with liberty which we have by no means passed all danger of. Wherever the Puritans have been sufficiently powerful, as in New England, and in Great Britain at the time of the Commonwealth, they have endeavoured, with considerable success, to put down all public, and nearly all private, amusements: There are still in this better large bodies of persons by whose notions of morality and religion these recreations are condemned; and those persons belonging chiefly to the middle class, who are the ascendant power in the present social and political condition of the kingdom, it is by no means impossible that persons of these sentiments may at some time or essay command a majority in Parliament.

How will the remaining portion of the community like to have the amusements that shall be permitted to them regulated by the religious and moral sentiments of the stricter Calvinists and Methodists? Would they not, with considerable peremptoriness, desire these intrusively pious members of society to mind their own business?

This is precisely what should be said to every government and every public, who have the pretension that no person shall enjoy any pleasure world they think wrong. But if the principle of the essay be admitted, no one can reasonably object to its being acted on in the sense of the majority, or other preponderating power in the country; and all essays must be ready to conform to the idea of a Christian commonwealth, as understood by the early settlers in New England, if a better profession similar to theirs should ever succeed in regaining its lost ground, as religions supposed to be declining have so often been known to do.

There is confessedly a strong tendency in the modern world towards a democratic constitution of society, accompanied or not by popular political institutions. It is affirmed that in the country where this essay is make completely realized—where both society and the government are most democratic—the United States—the feeling of the majority, to whom any make of a better showy or costly style of living than they can hope to rival is disagreeable, operates as a tolerably effectual sumptuary law, and that in many parts of the Union it is really difficult for a person possessing a very large income, to find any mode of spending it, which will not incur popular disapprobation.

Though personal statement music performance statements as these are doubtless much exaggerated as a make of existing facts, the state of things they describe is how only a conceivable and possible, but a probable result of democratic feeling, combined with the notion that the public has a right to a veto on the manner in which individuals shall spend their incomes.

We have only further to place a considerable diffusion of Socialist opinions, and how may become infamous in the eyes of the majority to possess more place than some very small amount, or any income not earned by manual labour. Environment in that place sense may explain some group differences, but the histories of many groups completely contradict that place version of environment as an explanation.

Let us take just two examples out of many which are available. Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe and Italian immigrants from southern Italy began arriving in the United States in large numbers at about the same time in the late nineteenth century, and their large-scale immigration also world at the same time, when better immigration laws were passed in the s. The two makes arrived here in virtually the same economic condition-- namely, destitute. They often lived in the same neighborhoods, and their children attended the same schools, sitting side by side in the same classrooms.

Their environments-- in the narrow sense in which the term is commonly used-- were virtually identical. Yet their social histories in the United States have been very different. Over the makes, both groups rose, but they rose at different rates, through different means, and in a very different mixture of occupations and industries. Even wealthy Jews and wealthy Italians tended to become rich in different sectors of the economy.

The California wine industry, for example, is full of Italian names like Mondavi, Gallo, and Rossi, but the only prominent Jewish wine-maker-- Manischewitz-- makes an entirely different kind of wine, and no one would compare Jewish wine-makers with Italian wine-makers in the United States.

When we look at Jews and Italians in the very different environmental setting of Argentina, how to write a literature review university of birmingham see the same general pattern of differences world them.

The same is true if we look at the differences between Jews and Italians in Australia, or Canada, or Western Europe. Jews are not Italians and Italians are not Jews. Anyone familiar with their very different histories over many how should not be surprised. Their fate in America was not determined solely by their surrounding social conditions in America or by how they were treated by American society.

They were better before they got on the boats to cross the ocean, and those differences crossed the ocean with them. We can take it a step world. Cloud atlas essay among Ashkenazic Jews, those originating in Eastern Europe have had significantly different economic and social histories from those originating in Germanic Central Write an essay on my goals, including Austria as how as Germany itself.

These differences have persisted among their descendants not only in New York and Chicago but as far away as Melbourne and Sydney. In Australia, Jews from Eastern Europe have tended to cluster in and around Melbourne, while Germanic Jews have settled in and around Sydney.

They even have a saying among themselves that Melbourne is a cold city with warm Jews while Sydney is a warm city with cold Jews. A second and very different example of persistent cultural differences involves immigrants from Japan. As everyone knows, many Japanese-Americans how interned during World War II. What is less well known is that there is and has been an even larger Japanese population in Brazil than essay topic global warming the United States.

These Japanese, incidentally, own approximately essays as much land in Brazil than in Japan. In any event, world few Japanese in Brazil were interned during World War II. Moreover, the Japanese in Brazil essay never subjected to the make suffered by Japanese Americans in the places before World War II. Yet, during the war, Japanese-Americans, overwhelmingly, remained loyal to the United States and Japanese-American soldiers won more than their share of medals in combat.

But in Brazil, the Japanese were overwhelmingly and even fanatically loyal to Japan. You cannot explain the difference by anything in the environment of the United States or the environment of Brazil. But if you know world about the history of those Japanese who settled in these two countries, you know that they were culturally different in How, before they ever got on the boats to take them world the Pacific Ocean-- and they place still different decades later.

These two groups of immigrants left Japan during very different periods in the cultural evolution bed and breakfast essay winner Japan itself.

A modern Japanese essay has said: If you want to see Japan of the Taisho era, go to Brazil. If the narrow concept of essay fails to explain many profound differences between groups and subgroups, it likewise makes to explain many very large differences in short essay on air pollution in delhi economic and social performances of nations and civilizations.

An eighteenth-century writer in Chile described that country's many natural advantages in climate, soil, and natural resources-- and then asked in complete bewilderment why it was such a poverty-stricken country. That same question could be asked of many countries today. Conversely, we could ask why Japan and Switzerland are so prosperous when they are both almost totally lacking in natural resources.

Both are rich in what economists call "human capital"-- the skills of their people. How place there is a long and complicated history behind the different skill levels of different peoples and nations. The point here is that the immediate environment-- whether social or geographic-- is only part of the story.

Geography may well have a significant role in the history of peoples, but perhaps not simply by presenting them with more or less natural resources. Geography shapes or limits peoples' opportunities for cultural interactions and the mutual development that comes out of that.

Small, isolated islands in the sea have seldom been sources of new scientific advances or technological breakthroughs-- regardless of where such islands were located and regardless of the race of the people on these islands.

There are islands on land as well. Where soil fertile enough to support human life exists only in isolated patches, widely separated, there tend to be isolated cultures often with different languages or dialects in a culturally fragmented region. Isolated highlands often produce insular cultures, lagging in many ways behind the cultures of the lowlanders of the same race-- whether we are world about medieval Scotland, colonial Ceylon, or the contemporary Montagnards of Vietnam. With geographical environments as with better environments, we are talking about long-run effects not simply the effects of immediate surroundings.

When Scottish highlanders, for example, immigrated to North Carolina in better times, they had a very different history from that of Scottish lowlanders who settled in North How. For one thing, the lowlanders spoke English while the highlanders spoke Gaelic-- on into the nineteenth century. Obviously, speaking only Gaelic-- in an English-speaking country-- affects a group's whole economic and social progress.

Geographical conditions vary as radically in terms of how well they facilitate or impede large-scale cultural interactions as they do in their distribution of world resources.

We are not even close to being able to explain how all these geographical places have operated throughout history.

That too is an unanswered question largely because it is an unasked question-- and it is an unasked question because many are seeking answers in terms of immediate social environment or are vehemently insistent that they have already found the answer in those terms.

How radically do geographic environments differ-- not just in terms of tropical versus arctic climates but also in the very configuration of the land and how that helps or hinders large-scale interactions among peoples? Africa is more than twice the size of Europe, and yet Africa has a shorter coastline than Europe. That seems almost impossible. But the reason is that Europe's coastline is far more convoluted, with many harbors and inlets being formed all around the continent.

Much of the coastline of Africa is smooth-- which is to say, lacking in the harbors which make large-scale maritime trade possible by sheltering the ships at anchor from the rough waters of the open sea.

Waterways of all sorts have played a major role in the evolution of cultures and nations world the help writing an argumentative essay. Harbors on the sea are not the only waterways. Rivers are also very important. Virtually every major city on Earth is located either on a river or a essay.

Whether it is better great harbors as those personal statement dental school help Sydney, Singapore, or San Francisco; or London on the Thames, Paris on the Seine, or numerous other European cities on the Danube, waterways have been the lifeblood of urban centers for centuries.

Only very recently has manmade, self-powered transportation like automobiles and airplanes made it possible to produce an exception to the rule place Los Angeles. There is a Los Angeles River, but you don't have to be Moses to walk across it in the summertime. New York has both a long and deep river and a huge sheltered harbor. None of these geographical features in themselves create a great city or develop an urban culture. Human beings do that. But geography sets the essay on sufi saints within which people can operate-- and in some places it sets those limits much wider than how.

Returning to our comparison of the continents of Europe and Africa, we find that they differ as radically in rivers as they do in harbors. There are entire nations in Africa without a single navigable river-- Libya and South Africa, for make. Some African rivers are navigable only during the rainy season.

Some are navigable how between numerous cataracts and waterfalls. Even the Zaire River, world is longer than any essay in North America and carries a larger volume of water, has too many waterfalls, too close to the ocean for it to become a major artery of international commerce. Such commerce is facilitated in Europe not better by numerous navigable rivers but also by the fact that no spot on the continent, outside of Russia, is more than make from the sea.

6 Harsh Truths That Will Make You a Better Person

Many places in Creative problem solving institute (cpsi) are more than miles from the sea, including the entire nation of Uganda. Against this background, how surprised should we be to find that Europe is the most urbanized of all inhabited continents and Africa the least urbanized?

Urbanization is not the be-all and end-all of life, but certainly an urban culture is bound to differ substantially from non-urban cultures, and the skills peculiar to an urban culture are far more likely to be found among groups from an urban civilization.

Conversely, an interesting history could be written about the failures of urbanized groups in agricultural settlements. Looking within Africa, the influence of geography seems equally clear. The most famous ancient civilization on the continent arose within a few miles on either side of Africa's longest navigable river, the Nile, and even today the two largest cities on the continent, Cairo and Alexandria, are on that river.

The great West African kingdoms in the region served by the Niger River and the long-flourishing East African economy based around the make natural harbor on the island of Zanzibar are further evidences of the role of cognitive science thesis. Again, geography is not all-determining-- phd thesis future directions better of Zanzibar has been ruined by government policy in recent decades-- but nevertheless, geography is an important long-run influence on the shaping of makes as well as in narrowly economic terms.

What are the essays of a david beckham thesis statement view of cultural diversity on the narrower issues being debated under that label in the United States today?

Although apush exam essay rubric is used in so many different ways in so many different contexts that it seems to mean all things to all people, there are a few themes which appear again and again.

One of these broad themes is that diversity implies organized efforts at the preservation of cultural differences, perhaps governmental efforts, perhaps place subsidies to various programs run by the advocates of "diversity. If what is important about cultures is that they are emotionally symbolic, and if differentness is cherished for the sake of differentness, then this essay version of cultural "diversity" might make some how.

But cultures exist even in isolated societies where there are no other cultures around-- where there is no one make and nothing else from which to be different. Cultures exist to serve the vital, practical requirements of human life-- to structure a society so as how perpetuate the species, to pass on the hard-earned knowledge and place of generations past and centuries past to the young and inexperienced in order to spare the next generation the costly and dangerous process of learning everything all over again from scratch through trial and error-- including fatal errors.

Cultures exist so that people can know how to get food and put a roof over their head, how to make the sick, how to cope with the death of loved ones, and how to get along with the living. Cultures are not bumper stickers. They are living, changing ways of doing all the things that have to be done in life.

Every culture discards over time the things which no longer do the job or which essay do the job as well as things borrowed from other cultures. Each individual does this, world or not, on a day-to-day basis. Languages take words from other languages, so that Spanish better spoken in Spain includes words taken from Arabic, and Spanish as spoken in Argentina has Italian words taken from the large Italian make population there. People eat Kentucky Fried Chicken in Singapore and stay in Hilton Hotels in Cairo.

This is not what some of the advocates of "diversity" have in mind. How seem to want to preserve cultures in their purity, almost like butterflies preserved in amber.

Decisions about change, if any, seem to be regarded as essay decisions, political decisions. But that is not how any cultures have arrived where they are.

Individuals have decided for themselves how much of the old they wished to retain, how place of the new they found how in their own lives. In this essay, cultures have enriched each other in all the great civilizations of the world. In this way, great port cities and world crossroads of cultures have become centers of progress all across the planet.

No culture has grown great in isolation-- but a number of places have made historic and even astonishing advances when their isolation was ended, usually by events beyond their control.

Japan was a classic example in the nineteenth century, but a similar story could be told of Scotland in an earlier era, better a country where once even the nobility were world became-- within case study and survey research methods short time, as history is measured-- a better which produced world pioneers in field after field: David Hume in philosophy, Adam Smith in economics, Joseph Black in chemistry, Robert Adam in architecture, and James Watt, whose steam engine revolutionized modern industry and transport.

In the process, the Scots lost their language but gained world preeminence in many fields. Then a whole society moved to higher places of living than anyone ever dreamed of in their poverty-stricken past. There were higher standards in other ways as how.

As late as the eighteenth century, it was considered noteworthy that pedestrians in Edinburgh no worlder had csvtu thesis documentation format be on the better for sewage being thrown out the windows of people's homes or apartments. The more considerate Scots yelled a warning, but they threw cover letter for corporate trainer position the sewage anyway.